Problems and prospects of development of SMART economy in the Post-Socialist States (challenges of the future)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.09.25.01%20Keywords:
post-socialist countries , economic development , innovation, smart - technologies, intellectualization, institutionalization, socialization, ecologizationAbstract
Post-socialist transformations have been in the focus of attention of scientists around the world for more than 30 years. Thus, the issues of smart-economy development in post-socialist countries are of particular relevance, since it is possible to provide the population with a decent standard of living in modern conditions only through the implementation of innovative development and introduction of the latest smart technologies aimed at the development of intellectualization, institutionalization, socialization, and ecologization in all spheres of society. The purpose of this article was to study the features of the development of the economies of post-socialist countries and to determine the problems and prospects for the formation of a smart-economy. The research was based on a qualitative combination of general scientific methods. In particular, the study of the existing base of scientific literature used methods of analysis (logical and statistical analysis, as well as analysis of the structure and dynamics), synthesis, induction, deduction, concretization, methods of generalization, and analogy. For clarity, the data obtained as a result of the analysis are presented using tabular methods. As a result of the study, the essence and features of the smart-economy have been defined, and the reasons for the need for the transition of modern society to the smart-economy have been established.
References
Borzenko, O. (2019). Imperatives of development of post-socialist countries financial markets. University Economic Bulletin, 43, 80-88.
Brzezinski, M., Sałach, K. (2020). Why Wealth Inequality Differs Between Post-Socialist Countries? SSRN Electronic Journal, 10, 21-39.
Druker P. (2020). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. K.: KM-BUKS, 2020. 240 .
Doing Business 2020. (2020). URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32436/9781464814402.pdf
GDP, current prices, Billions of U.S. dollars. (2020). URL: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWOR LD/RUS
GDP per capita, (current international $)/World Bank.(2020). URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?locale=ru&locations=RU
Global Competitiveness. Report 2020 World Economic Forum. (2020). URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2020
Global Innovation Index 2020. (2020). URL: https://w ww.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf
Human Development Report 1990. (1990).URL: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/219/hdr_1990_en_complete_nostats.pdf
Human Development Report 2020. The next frontier Human development and the Anthropocene. (2020). URL: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2020.pdf
Kalenyuk, I., Tsymbal, L., Uninets, I. (2021). INTELLIGENT DRIVERS OF SMART ECONOMY IN THE GLOBAL ECOSYSTEM. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7, 91-100.
Kalenyuk, I., Uninets, I. (2020). Factors and features of the smart economy development. Economics & Education. 5. 42-47.
Kalinkova, S. (2019). Measuring the competitiveness of post-socialist countries. University Economic Bulletin, 90-98.
Kristoffersen, E., Blomsma, F., Mikalef, P. (2020). The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 120, 241-261.
Kuźmar, S., Piatek, D. (2019). Institutional determinants of inequality in chosen post-socialist countries: the role of political freedom. Ekonomia i Prawo, 18, 295–315.
Lin, Lin, Tjio, H. (2020). Alternative Investments, Sustainability in the Digital Age. European Business Organization Law Review, 21, 1-5.
Mammadova, G. (2020). Innovative Tools for Investment Management in the Digital Economy: a Guide for Post-Socialist Countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 10, 181-190.
Mikiashvili, N., Karmowska, G. (2020). The development of Georgia and Poland compared to other post-socialist countries. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis Oeconomica, 352, 43-58.
Population of the world and countries. (2020). URL: https://countrymeters.info
Ranking of countries in the world according to the index of economic freedom Ranking of countries in the world according to the index of economic freedom 2020. (2020). URL: https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/index-of-economic-freedom
Ranking of countries according to the level of perception of corruption 2020. (2020). URL: https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/corruption-perceptions-index/info
Roland, G. (2018). The Evolution of Post-Communist Systems: Eastern Europe vs. China. Economics of Transition, 26 (4), 589–614.
Sikora-Fernandez, D. (2018). Smarter cities in post-socialist country: Example of Poland. Cities, 78, 10,10-16.
Sotnyk, I., Zavrazhnyi, K., Kasianenko, V., Roubík, H., Sidorov, O. (2020). Investment Management of Business Digital Innovations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 10, 95-109.
Svirčić Gotovac, A. (2020): Učinci procesa privatizacije stanovanja u postsocijalističkoj Hrvatskoj, Geoadria, 25 (2), 151-176.
The Inclusive Development Index 2020. (2020). URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2018.pdf
Uninets, I. (2021). Subjective disposition of smart economy. Economics & Education, 6, 12-16.
Zucman, G. (2019). Global Wealth Inequality. Annual Review of Economics, 11 (1), 109– 38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
