Legal Principles of the Advocacy Activities in Azerbaijan and in the post-Soviet States: The Role of Digitalization and Technological Aspects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.12.25.14

Keywords:

legal aid, constitutional rights, right to defence, digitalization

Abstract

The Bar is a self-governing institution of civil society and plays an important role within the unified law enforcement system. The aim of the research was to systematize existing practices and subsequently develop measures to improve the organizational foundations of the Bar in the Republic of Azerbaijan. The methods of this study included a literature review and a systematic qualitative analysis of foreign practices of legal organization and the evaluation of their applicability in the Republic of Azerbaijan. The search for relevant academic works was conducted in the scientometric databases Scopus and Web of Science for the period 2018–2023. Based on the PRISMA recommendations, 57 relevant academic papers meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. The use of these methods allowed for a comprehensive, holistic, and objective examination of the Bar and its principles in both Azerbaijan and foreign countries. The study concluded by arguing that legal practice in the Republic of Azerbaijan, as in other post-Soviet countries, scan take various organizational forms, but all participants in the Bar share one primary goal: to contribute to the development of their professional activities. The author asserts that, in order to be effective, the Bar must support the economic activities of its members, with these activities serving only as a supplementary function to the main professional activities. The study also provides specific recommendations for improving the legal regulation of the organizational structure of the Bar in the Republic of Azerbaijan, which will enhance its operational efficiency.

References

Alpa, G. (2012). CESL, fundamental rights, general principles, rules of contract law. In G. Alpa, G. Conte, U. Perfetti, & F. Westphalen (Eds.), The proposed common European sales law – The lawyers’ view (pp. 31–44). Berlin, Boston: Otto Schmidt/De Gruyter european law pub. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866539853.31

Anikeenko, Y., Gracheva, M., & Novoselova, N. (2022). The right to defense in proceedings on cases of administrative offenses. SHS Web of Conferences, 134, Article 00062. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400062

Belova, M. V., & Byelov, D. M. (2023). The role and place of the advocacy institute in the mechanism of protection of human and citizen rights and freedoms. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, (6), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.06.7

Benish, A., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2023). Take-up advocacy in social work practice: A care-oriented approach. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad172

Buta, B., Guimaraes, T., & Akutsu, L. (2020). Governance in the Brazilian Federal Public Defenders’ Office. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.317

Campbell, A., Deshpande, S., Rundle-Thiele, S., & West, T. (2023). Social advocacy: A conceptual model to extend post-intervention effectiveness. Journal of Strategic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254x.2023.2179653

Caserta, S. (2020). Digitalization of the legal field and the future of large law firms. Laws, 9(2), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws9020014

Chaara, I., Falisse, J.-B., & Moriceau, J. (2022). Does legal aid improve access to justice in ‘fragile’ settings? Evidence from Burundi. Journal of Peace Research, 59(6), 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433211055633

Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (1995). https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30420395

Daci, J. (2010). Legal principles, legal values and legal norms: Are they the same or different?. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 2, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2010.02.11

Gelfgren, S., Ineland, J., & Cocq, C. (2021). Social Media and disability advocacy organizations: Caught between hopes and realities. Disability & Society, 37(7), 1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1867069

Jackson, S. R., & Kellogg, K. C. (2023). Triadic advocacy work. Organization Science, 34(1), 456–483. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1588

Jost, J. T. (2020). What is social justice?. In A theory of system justification (pp. 13–48). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13qfw6w.5

Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan "On courts and judges", No. 310-IQ. (1997). https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30597388

Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan "On police", No. 727-IQ. (1999a). https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30602031

Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan "On lawyers and legal practice", No. 783-IQ. (1999b). https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30608603

Lemann Kristiansen, B. (2017). Legal aid in Denmark. In O. Halvorsen Rønning & O. Hammerslev (Eds.), Outsourcing legal aid in the nordic welfare states (pp. 99–124). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46684-2_5

Loskutov, T., Bilianska, N., Ustinova-Boichenko, H., Beschastnyy, V., & Dubivka I. (2020). The law-enforcement system in the civil rights and freedoms protection system: the international comparative aspect. Revista San Gregorio, (42), 10–18. http://201.159.222.49/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/1536/2-TYMUR

Mehdiyev, P. A. (2021). The concept and content of the right to professional legal assistance. European Perspectives, (2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.32782/ep.2021.2.7

Merdzanovic, A., & Nicolaidis, K. (2021). Advocacy for a citizen‐centric rule of law agenda: How do we bring the rule of law to life?. European Law Journal, 27(1–3), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12385

Miniato, L. (2022). L'autonomie des parties au procès pénal. Les Cahiers de la Justice, (2), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.2202.0345

Moore, J., Plano Clark, V. L., Foote, L. A., & Dariotis, J. K. (2019). Attorney–client communication in public defense: A qualitative examination. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(6), 908–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419861672

Mozhaikina, O. (2020). International legal regulation of advocacy. Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law, 110(3), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2020(110)03

Nazarov, I. V., Ovcharenko, O. M., Kovalyova, Y. O., & Remeskova, Y. O. (2020). Independence of an advocate in disciplinary proceedings: Comparative approach with a focus on Ukrainian experience. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(2), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.2(40).22

Nicolaides, A., & Vettori, S. (2019). The duty of lawyers: Virtue ethics and pursuing a hopeless legal case. Athens Journal of Law, 5(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.5-2-4

Nuna, M., Kodai, D. A., & Moonti, R. M. (2020). Code of ethics and the role of advocates in providing legal aid to the poor. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 1(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i2.35986

Pitasi, A., Brasil Dib, N., & Portolese, G. (2018). Legislative innovation. towards a global law. making process: The case of global citizenship policy modelling. International Review of Sociology, 28(3), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2018.1529102

Ravanan, A., Ghashghaei, L., & Ghashghaei, G. R. (2016). Independence of lawyers and legal institutions and its impact on the country’s development. Journal of Politics and Law, 9(5), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v9n5p24

Reed, K. (2020). The experience of a legal career: Attorneys’ impact on the system and the system’s impact on attorneys. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16(1), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-051120-014122

Riswanto, E., & Suparno, S. (2021). Advocate legal assistance as a way of protecting human rights. In M. Rachmawati, F. J. Nugroho, E. E. Supriyanto, H. Saksono, A. N. Cahyo, F. Natalia ... E. Windy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International conference on law, social science, economics, and education, ICLSSEE 2021. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306199

Sam, S., & Pearson, A. (2019). Community legal centres in the digital era: The use of digital technologies in Queensland community legal centres. Law, Technology and Humans, I, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v1i0.1305

Selkova, A. (2022). Would online legal services guarantee the availability of justice and legal aid?. SHS Web of Conferences, 134, Article 00035. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400035

Sharma, M., Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2022). Evaluating the cumulative impact of indigent defense attorneys on criminal justice outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 81, Article 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101927

Smith, D., Borders, K., Katsikas, S., & Maschi, T. (2023). Holistic defense: Attorney perception and social work integration in the courtroom. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 7(2), 75–107. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.1936-9298.2023.7.2.75-107

Tonstad, K. M. (2021). Politics on trial? Criminal justice and Egyptʼs political opposition in the aftermath of July 2013. Oslo Law Review, 8(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2021-01-03

Tymoshenko, A. A. (2018). Independence of the judge, the prosecutor and the investigator. Russian Journal of Legal Studies, 5(4), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18451

Varuhas, J. N. E. (2020). The principle of legality. The Cambridge Law Journal, 79(3), 578–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197320000598

Whalen, R. (2022). Defining legal technology and its implications. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac005

Wright, R., & Roberts, J. (2023). Expanded criminal defense lawyering. Annual Review of Criminology, 6(1), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-035326

Zamroni, M. (2020). Legal liability of advocates in legal services contracts. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(1), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/sjijl.v3i1.50

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Aliyev, A. J. oghlu. (2023). Legal Principles of the Advocacy Activities in Azerbaijan and in the post-Soviet States: The Role of Digitalization and Technological Aspects. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(4), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.12.25.14