An Asymmetric Approach to Evaluate Sectoral CO2 Emissions in Turkey

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2024.06.25.03

Keywords:

NARDL, Sectoral Analysis, Environmental Economics, Environmental Policy, CO2 Emissions, Turkey

Abstract

The increase in population and economic growth are significant factors that contribute to the deterioration of the environment, primarily through the emission of carbon pollutants. Therefore, the overuse of natural resources, degradation of natural ecosystems, and the increasing release of harmful gases threaten our ability to protect the environment for future generations. Although there is a global agreement on the need for clean and carbon-free energy systems to achieve sustainable development, emerging countries persist in giving more priority to economic objectives rather than environmental preservation. This research aimed to explore strategies to mitigate sector-specific emissions and ecological deterioration in Turkey, where enforcing environmental regulations has proven inadequate. This quantitative study analysed symmetric and asymmetric interactions between sectoral emissions and sectoral value added per capita, GDP per capita, and human capital with the nonlinear autoregressive distributed (NARDL) time series method in Turkey. The connections between emissions from different sectors, the value contributed to the economy, the income per person, and the growth of human capital were examined in the research. The study's findings indicated that policies to increase production and develop human capital are effective in the short term for reducing carbon emissions in the services sector. Over time, policies that prioritise raising income levels and building up human capital have been successful. Analyses of strategies to reduce agricultural emissions reveal that implementing short-term investments in human capital and long-term revenue increases are successful policies to reduce emission levels in the industry. Regarding the industry, past levels of emissions in the immediate future exert a constraint on managing the present period's emission levels. Given the asymmetrical impacts, it is evident that people whose quality of life improves through investments in human capital are more likely to prioritise environmental sustainability and adopt practices that reduce emissions in production. Thus, it is evident that the enhancement of human capital may serve as a significant policy tool across all industries.

References

Acheampong, A. O. (2018). Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: What causes what and where?. Energy Economics 74, 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.022

Adebayo, T. S., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: Application of wavelet tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23(11), 16057–16082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2

Aguilera, E., Vila-Traver, J., Deemer, B. R., Infante-Amate, J., Guzmán, G. I., & González de Molina, M. (2019). Methane emissions from artificial Waterbodies dominate the carbon footprint of irrigation: A study of transitions in the food–energy–Water–Climate nexus (Spain, 1900–2014). Environmental Science and Technology 53(9), 5091–5101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00177

Agyekum, E. B., Kumar, N. M., Mehmood, U., Panjwani, M. K., Haes Alhelou, H., Adebayo, T. S., & Al-Hinai, A. (2021). Decarbonize Russia — A best–worst method approach for assessing the renewable energy potentials, opportunities and challenges. Energy Reports 7, 4498–4515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.039

Ahmad, N., Iqbal, A., & Mahmood, H. (2013). CO2 Emission, population and industrial growth linkages in selected South Asian countries: A co-integration analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(4), 615–622. https://www.idosi.org/wasj/wasj21(4)13/17.pdf

Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026

Aslan, A., Destek, M. A., & Okumus, I. (2018). Sectoral carbon emissions and economic growth in the US: Further evidence from rolling window estimation method. Journal of Cleaner Production 200, 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.237

Balado-Naves, R., Baños-Pino, J. F., & Mayor, M. (2018). Do countries influence neighbouring pollution? A spatial analysis of the EKC for CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 123, 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.059

Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., & Khan, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter? Business Strategy and the Environment 30(1). 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615

Cheikh, N.B., Zaied, Y.B., & Chevallier, J. (2021). On the nonlinear relationship between energy use and CO2 emissions within an EKC framework: Evidence from panel smooth transition regression in the MENA region. Research in International Business and Finance 55, Article 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101331

Chen, D., Chen, S., & Jin, H. (2018). Industrial agglomeration and CO2 emissions: Evidence from 187 Chinese prefecture-level cities over 2005–2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.068

Cil, N. (2023). Re-examination of pollution haven hypothesis for Turkey with Fourier approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(4), 10024–10036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22800-8

Degirmencioglu Aydin, N., & Aydin, M. (2023). An environmental impact assessment of major economic sectors in Turkey: Economics and law perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01400-y

Diakoulaki, D., & Mandaraka, M. (2007). Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling industrial growth from CO2 emissions in the EU manufacturing sector. Energy Economics, 29(4), 636–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.005

Feenstra, R., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130954

Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2013). Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 57, 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.011

Gill, A. R., Viswanathan, K. K., & Hassan, S. (2017). A test of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for carbon emission and potential of renewable energy to reduce green house gases (GHG) in Malaysia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(3), 1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9929-5

Granger, C. W., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration [Economics working paper No. 2002-02]. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313831

Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The quarterly journal of economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443

Hamit-Haggar, M. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Economics, 34(1), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.005

Hanif, I., Faraz Raza, S. M., Gago-de-Santos, P., & Abbas, Q. (2019). Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: Some empirical evidence. Energy, 171, 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.011

Hashmi, S. M., Yu, X., Syed, Q. R., & Rong, L. (2023). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis amidst climate policy uncertainty: Sectoral analysis using the novel Fourier ARDL approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03296-9

Hettige, H., Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (2019). Industrial pollution in economic development: The environmental Kuznets curve revisited. In K. W. Easter (Ed.), The economics of water quality (pp. 27–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240060

Hocaoglu, F. O., & Karanfil, F. (2011). Examining the link between carbon dioxide emissions and the share of industry in GDP: Modeling and testing for the G-7 countries. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3612–3620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.063

Katircioğlu, S., & Katircioğlu, S. (2018). Testing the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters, 25(11), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1361004

Kumbaroğlu, G. (2011). A sectoral decomposition analysis of Turkish CO2 emissions over 1990–2007. Energy, 36(5), 2419–2433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.027

Mikayilov, J. I., Galeotti, M., & Hasanov, F. J. (2018). The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1558–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.269

Mol, A. P., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010008414511

Moutinho, V., Madaleno, M., & Elheddad, M. (2020). Determinants of the environmental Kuznets curve considering economic activity sector diversification in the OPEC countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, Article 122642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122642

Moutinho, V., Varum, C., & Madaleno, M. (2017). How economic growth affects emissions? An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in Portuguese and Spanish economic activity sectors. Energy Policy, 106, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.069

Musa, K. S., Maijama’a, R., & Yakubu, M. (2022). Deforestation, sectoral Co2 emissions and environmental pollution nexus: Evidence from Nigeria. Asian Research Journal of Current Science, 4(1), 161–181. https://globalpresshub.com/index.php/ARJOCS/article/view/1500

Najafi Alamdarlo, H. (2016). Water consumption, agriculture value added and carbon dioxide emission in Iran, environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13, 2079–2090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1005-4

Nguyen, C. P., Schinckus, C., & Dinh Su, T. (2020). Economic integration and CO2 emissions: Evidence from emerging economies. Climate and Development 12(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1630350

Ojaghlou, M., & Ugurlu, E. (2023). Urbanization and climate change: Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and STIRPAT analysis for Turkey. Economics and Sociology, 16(1), 259–270. https://www.proquest.com/openview/cdb7fa38ff7b137e92823a816ec73606/

Ojaghlou, M., Ugurlu, E., Kadłubek, M., & Thalassinos, E. (2023). Economic activities and management issues for the environment: An environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and STIRPAT analysis in Turkey. Resources, 12(5), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12050057

Okamoto, S. (2013). Impacts of growth of a service economy on CO2 emissions: Japan’s case. Journal of Economic Structures, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-2409-2-8

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616

Rahman, M. M., & Kashem, M. A. (2017). Carbon emissions, energy consumption and industrial growth in Bangladesh: Empirical evidence from ARDL cointegration and Granger causality analysis. Energy Policy, 110, 600–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.006

Ramos, A. H., Madaleno, M., & Amorim Varum, C. (2018). An analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Portugal: Sector data and innovation effects. In 2018 15th International conference on the European energy market (EEM). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469919

Ru, M., Shindell, D. T., Seltzer, K. M., Tao, S., & Zhong, Q. (2018). The long-term relationship between emissions and economic growth for SO2, CO2, and BC. Environmental Research Letters 13(12), Article 124021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaece2

Sarkodie, S. A., & Ozturk, I. (2020). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Kenya: A multivariate analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, Article 109481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109481

Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies 46(1), 106–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249

Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In R. Sickles & W. Horrace (Eds.), Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9

Soubbotina, T. P. (2013). Beyond economic growth: An introduction to sustainable development (2nd ed.). World Bank Publications.

Su, Z., Umar, M., Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management 298, Article 113463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113463

Xue, C., Shahbaz, M., Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., & Sinha, A. (2022). Clean energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: What is the role of economic policy uncertainty?. Renewable Energy 184, 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.006

Yang, L., Yang, Y., Zhang, X., & Tang, K. (2018). Whether China's industrial sectors make efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from production? – A decomposed decoupling analysis. Energy 160, 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.186

Downloads

Published

2024-04-10

How to Cite

Kazar, G. (2024). An Asymmetric Approach to Evaluate Sectoral CO2 Emissions in Turkey. Futurity Economics&Law, 4(2), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2024.06.25.03