Claim and its modern modifications: definitions of the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.03.25.1Keywords:
lawsuit , claim modification, claim security, claim forms of defense, ways to modify a claimAbstract
Institutionalization of the right of action at the inter-national level is going on systematically with the formation and provision of the rights of access to the lawsuit for all persons. The purpose of the study is the analysis of algorithms of modern modifications of the lawsuit based on theoretical-methodological and practice-oriented tools. The methodological basis is formed with the help of general scientific methods of knowledge (dialectical, analysis, synthesis, generalization) and special methods (formal-legal, comparative law, interpretation of legal norms). For the proper protection of the rights, freedoms, and interests of individuals and legal entities, legislators have proposed a separate legal mechanism aimed at adapting the claim form of proceedings depending on the specifics of public-law disputes. In the period of rapid social transformations, there is a rapid increase in the number of those who intend to exercise their right to claim, which determines the modification of appropriate structures of justice, ensuring the balance of public interests of all participants of judicial protection. The result of the study are the author's definitions of the modification of the claim and ways of their implementation. The conducted study allowed to formulate of conclusions reflecting the main characteristics of claim modification, place, meaning, and their functional orientation and directions of improvement. Modern science offers different tools that can be used to modify a claim. Among them are administrative actions of the parties stipulated by law, specific procedural actions affecting the development of legal relations, the right to perform which is given to the parties as a result of a dispute, procedural possibility of an interested person to modify a claim by choosing the best ways.
References
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Ioannidis, J. P., Johnson, E., Jonas, K., Kousta, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lindsay, D. S., Morey, C. C., Munafò, M., Newell, B. R., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
Akpur, U. (2020). The effect of procrastination on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(4), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.4.681
Barritt, E., & Sediti, B. (2019). The symbolic value of leghari v federation of Pakistan: Climate change adjudication in the global south. King’s Law Journal: KLJ, 30(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2019.1648370
Bell, F. (2016). Empirical research in law. Griffith Law Review, 25(2), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1236440
CCJ/COSCA Post-Pandemic Planning Technology Working Group (2021). Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators, “Resolution 2: In Support of the Guiding Principles for Post-Pandemic Court Technology” Ncsc.org. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://ccj.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/51193/Resolution-2-In-Support-of-the-Guiding-Principles-for-Post-Pandemic-Court-Technology-.pdf.
Courtney, K., Timothy Errington, T., Sarah Schiavone, S. et al. (2020) Initial Evidence of Research Quality of Registered Reports Compared to the Traditional Publishing Model. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/7x9vy.
Egilmez, E., & Naylor-Tincknell, J. (2017). Altruism and Popularity. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 3(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.3.2.65
Eksi, H., Ozgenel, M., & Esad, M. (2020). The mediator role of organizational support in the relationship between organizational identity and organizational stress. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(4), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.4.643
Ertugrul-Akyol, B. (2019). Development of Computational Thinking Scale: Validity and reliability study. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.421
Filiz, B. (2020). The relationship between effective communication skills and verbal intelligence levels of faculty of sport sciences students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 603-612. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.603
Humby, T.-L. (2018). The thabametsi case: Case no 65662/16 earthlife Africa Johannesburg v minister of environmental affairs. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy007
Jurva (2020). The Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on State & Local Courts. See also: A. Reed and M. Alder. Zoom Courts Will Stick Around as Virus Forces Seismic Change, Bloomberg Law, 30. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/zoom-courts-will-stick-around-as-virus-forces-seismic-change.
Faruk, O., Ergene, T., & Dogan, N. (2019). Character strengths in turkey: Initial adaptation study of values in action inventory of strengths for youth (VIA-youth) and Life Satisfaction in young people. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.489
Kocaturk, M., & Bozdag, F. (2020). Xenophobia among university students: Its relationship with five factor model and dark triad personality traits. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.545
Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619
Mertol, H., & Gunduz, M. (2020). Trust perception from the eyes of children. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.447
Van Meter, H. J. (2020). Revising the DIKW pyramid and the real relationship between data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. Law, Technology and Humans, 2(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.1470
Ngozwana, N. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research methodology: Researcher’s reflections. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.1.19
Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619
Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2020). Human rights: The global south’s route to climate litigation. AJIL Unbound, 114, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2020.4
Schultheis, H., & Rooney, C. (2019, October 2). A Right to Counsel Is a Right to a Fighting Chance. Center for American Progress. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/poverty/reports/2019/10/02/475263/right-counsel-right-fighting-chance.
Haven, T. L., Errington, T. M., Gleditsch, K., van Grootel, L., Jacobs, A. M., Kern, F., Piñeiro, R., Rosenblatt, F., & Mokkink, L. (2020). Preregistering qualitative research: A Delphi study. In SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pz9jr
Vazire, S., & Holcombe, A. O. (2020). Where are the self-correcting mechanisms in science? In PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kgqzt
May, & Albert. (2018). Cyberbullying among college students: A look at its prevalence at a U.s. catholic university. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.2.101
Wulandari, T., Suharno, S., & Triyanto, T. (2018). Field trial analysis of teaching material Civic education based on problem based learning (PBL) to improve student’s outcome. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.259
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
