Some Aspects of the State Information Policy of the Modern State: Definitions of the Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.12.25.08Keywords:
information, policy, state policy, government, improvement, future, countries, effectivenessAbstract
It is necessary to underline that all civilized states link their future with the formation of a single information space. The group of the most informationally developed countries - the USA, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, England, Italy, Poland considering the creation of a single information space one of the priority tasks of the 21st century, agreed to cooperate in creating a global information infrastructure based on seven fundamental principles. Information policy is the use of information as a means to achieve political and other goals, the information impact of political actors on each other. It should be noted that information is currently one of the most important resources in the public administration system. The purpose of the research is to analyze the specific features of the formation and the development of the state information policy. Searching identified 65 articles from 2015 to 2021. In the context of the state information policy of the modern state 13 were selected for review. The main methods used in the work were: comparative, method of abstraction, deductive method, concretization. The study described in this paper provides a systematic review of the literature on the formation of the informative policy and the specific features of the policy of different countries of the world over the past decade. Based on a full-text analysis of 13 articles published in renowned databases and peer-reviewed journals, the study reveals the necessity to analyze the importance of the state information policy in the modern society. The results state that is impossible to overestimate the importance of information in business as far as it creates fortunes for its owners, and the lack of information or its misinterpretation destroys large financial corporations. The conclusion is oriented on the facts that the information forms a system of alliances and blocs of states, contributes to the overthrow of governments, affects the political life of billions of people around the world.
References
Pal, L. A. (2005). Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times. Toronto: Thomson Nelson
Potluka, O. (2011). Impact of EU cohesion policy in central Europe (1st ed.). Leipziger Uni-Vlg.
Melnyk, M. (2012). The essence of the concept of "state policy of information society development": generalization European and domestic interpretations. The essence of concept “state policy of the information society development”: generalization of european and native interpretations. Democratic Governance, 9, 12-16.
Latypova, E. Y., Nechaeva, E. V., Gilmanov, E. M., & Aleksandrova, N. V. (2019). Infringements on digital information: Modern state of the problem. SHS Web of Conferences, 62, 10004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196210004
Hoofnagle, C. J., van der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2019). The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 65–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501
Yang, L. (2023). Developing collaboration between research-oriented and practice-oriented experts in public administration: How does expert participation make a difference in public policy making and governance practice? Public Policy and Administration, 38(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720958468
Schneider, V. (2012). Governance and Complexity. Oxford University Press.
Kerssenfischer, M. (2022). Information effects of euro area monetary policy. Economics Letters, 216(110570), 110570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110570
Kang, M., Hovav, A., Lee, E. T., Um, S., & Kim, H. (2022). Development of methods for identifying an appropriate benchmarking peer to establish information security policy. Expert Systems with Applications, 201(117028), 117028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117028
Wang, F., Mbanyele, W., & Muchenje, L. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and stock liquidity: The mitigating effect of information disclosure. Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101553
Lefebvre, T. (2022). Information-theoretic policy learning from partial observations with fully informed decision makers. Pattern Recognition Letters, 164, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2022.10.025
Gai, P., & Tong, E. (2022). Information spillovers of US monetary policy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 72(103401), 103401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2022.103401
Bachmann, R., Gödl-Hanisch, I., & Sims, E. R. (2022). Identifying monetary policy shocks using the central bank’s information set. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 145(104555), 104555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104555
Van Hijfte, S. (2023). APIs for business: Security, privacy and new markets. Apress.
Lwin, M. O., & Williams, J. D. (2003). A model integrating the multidimensional developmental theory of privacy and theory of planned behavior to examine fabrication of information online. Marketing Letters, 14(4), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mark.0000012471.31858.e5
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research : ISR, 15(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032
Couture, F. L. (1993). National information policies: Strategies for the future. Government Information Quarterly, 10(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-624x(93)90063-6
Gawer, A. (2022). Digital platforms and ecosystems: remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation, 24(1), 110-124.
Steinebach, Y. (2022). Instrument choice, implementation structures, and the effectiveness of environmental policies: A cross‐national analysis. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 225-242.
Goyal, N., Taeihagh, A., & Howlett, M. (2022). Whither policy innovation? Mapping conceptual engagement with public policy in energy transitions research. Energy Research & Social Science, 89(102632), 102632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102632
Sholler, D. (2020). Infrastructuring as an occasion for resistance: Organized resistance to policy-driven information infrastructure development in the U.s. healthcare industry. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 29(4), 451–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09375-z
Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2020). Coalition government, legislative institutions, and public policy in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 64(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12453
Flew, T. (2020). Globalization, neo-globalization and post-globalization: The challenge of populism and the return of the national. Global Media and Communication, 16(1), 19-39.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
