Legal Methodology for Selecting Legitimate Targets during Armed Conflict
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2025.03.25.03Keywords:
armed conflict, international humanitarian law, targeting, distinction, proportionality, military necessity, autonomous weapons systems, hybrid warfare, legal regulationAbstract
The selection of legitimate targets during armed conflict is an integral part of international humanitarian law, which aims to limit harm to the civilian population and protect civilian objects from random or unjustified attacks. The study aims to analyse the methods of selecting legitimate targets in armed conflict within the framework of international humanitarian law and identify shortcomings in the existing legal regulation of this process. To achieve this goal, the study used a combination of several methods, in particular, a legal analysis of existing international norms and principles of IHL, a comparative analysis of the application of these principles in different armed conflicts, as well as a critical approach to existing gaps in legal regulation. Using such methods allows for in-depth research into the issues and to identify weaknesses in the legal mechanisms governing the selection of legitimate targets in armed conflicts. The study showed that the principle of distinction, which requires a clear separation of military targets from civilian objects, becomes difficult to apply due to the integration of new technologies capable of simultaneously striking various targets without complete human control. In addition, significant legal uncertainty was found regarding applying the principle of proportionality in the case of using such systems, which is exacerbated by the lack of a clear legal basis for their application. The study indicates that the selection of legitimate targets in armed conflict should be regulated more by using autonomous weapon systems and other new technologies to ensure compliance with distinction, proportionality and military necessity. Since existing legal norms often do not consider the specifics of such technologies, it is necessary to create international agreements that regulate the use of autonomous weapon systems in war conditions, providing liability for unlawful strikes and decision-making without proper control.
References
Ablamskyi, S., Tchobo, D. L. R., Romaniuk, V., Šimić, G., & Ilchyshyn, N. (2023). Assessing the responsibilities of the international criminal court in the investigation of war crimes in Ukraine. Novum Jus, 17(2), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.14718/novumjus.2023.17.2.14
Asada, M. (2024). The war in Ukraine under international law: Its use of force and armed conflict aspects. International Community Law Review, 26(1-2), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341493
Ahmad, N., Rahim, F., & Aziz, N. (2024). Can international humanitarian law regulate recent drone strikes?: A case study. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 17(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2024.17.1.09
Bayrak, M. E. (2024). State responsibility for targeted killings by drones: An analysis through the lens of IHL principles. Law & Justice Review, 15(27), 81–126. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ljr/issue/82725/1419953
BBC News. (2013, October 17). Guide to the Syrian opposition. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-15798218
Balazünbül, Z. (2021). Drohnentechnologie und moderne Kriegführung. Carl Grossmann. https://doi.org/10.24921/2021.94115956
Bellal, A., & Casey-Maslen, S. (2022). The Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions in context. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192868909.001.0001
Byczyński, M. (2024). The legal status of ‘civilian hackers’ under international humanitarian law. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 106, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.106.06
Cernat, R. (2022). Lethal autonomous weapon systems – emerging and potentially disruptive technology. Romanian Military Thinking, 2022(4), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.55535/rmt.2022.4.08
Cohen, A., & Zlotogorski, D. (2021). Proportionality in international humanitarian law: Consequences, precautions, and procedures. Oxford University Press.
Dov Bachmann, S., Putter, D., & Duczynski, G. (2023). Hybrid warfare and disinformation: A Ukraine war perspective. Global Policy, 14(5), 858–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13257
Ekanayake, C. (2022). The International Humanitarian Law Principle of Distinction and UN Peace Support Operations’ Deployment Objectives – Conflicting Approaches and Undesirable Outcomes? In J. Vidmar (Ed.), Hague Yearbook of International Law / Annuaire de La Haye de droit international, Vol. 33 (2020) (pp. 191–223). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004518216_007
Haruna, A. L., Bukar, Dr. L., & Karumi, B. (2014). Principle of distinction in armed conflict: An analysis of the legitimacy of ‘combatants and military objectives’ as a military target. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(3), 15–24. http://www.ijhssi.org/
Gandhi V. H. (2023). Basic principles of international humanitarian law. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9476
Gisel, L., Rodenhäuser, T., & Dörmann, K. (2020). Twenty years on: International humanitarian law and the protection of civilians against the effects of cyber operations during armed conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 102(913), 287–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383120000387
Grzebyk, P. (2018). To kill or not to kill: The use of force against legitimate targets in armed conflicts. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 8(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0051
Farhat, S. A., Nurdin, R., & Basir, S. B. (2022). Attacks against civilian objects: An analysis under international humanitarian law. Hasanuddin Law Review, 8(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i1.3548
Ferraro, T. (2021). International humanitarian law, principled humanitarian action, counterterrorism and sanctions: Some perspectives on selected issues. International Review of the Red Cross, 103(916-917), 109–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383121000965
International Committee of the Red Cross. (2023). ICRC annual report 2023. https://library.icrc.org/library/docs/DOC/icrc-annual-report-2023-2.pdf
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (n.d.). The Conflicts. United Nations. https://www.icty.org/en/about/what-former-yugoslavia/conflicts
Khorram-Manesh, A., Burkle, F. M., Goniewicz, K., & Robinson, Y. (2021). Estimating the number of civilian casualties in modern armed conflicts: A systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.765261
Konert, A., & Balcerzak, T. (2021). Military autonomous drones (UAVs): From fantasy to reality—Legal and ethical implications. Transportation Research Procedia, 59, 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.11.121
Koruts, U. Z. (2023). Investigation by the international criminal court of Russian war crimes in Ukraine. Scientific Notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Juridical Sciences, (2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.32782/tnu-2707-0581/2023.2/28
Kubiak, M. (2023). Basic principles of international humanitarian law of armed conflict. Security Dimensions, 46(46), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.2235
Łubiński, P. (2021). Hybrid warfare or hybrid threat – The weaponization of migration as an example of the use of lawfare – Сase study of Poland. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 51, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202209
Milanovic, M., & Papic, T. (2022). International law in the countries of the former Yugoslavia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4263080
Mowafi, H., & Leaning, J. (2018). Documenting deaths in the Syrian war. The Lancet Global Health, 6(1), e14-e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30457-6
Piątkowski, M. (2021). Wojna powietrzna a międzynarodowe prawo humanitarne. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-942-9
Perišić, P., & Tomljenović, M. (2024). Legal permissibility of autonomous weapon systems, with specific reference to the principles of international humanitarian law. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 61(4), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2024.61.154.531
Post, H. H. G. (2022). The State of the International Criminal Court, of Special Tribunals and of International Criminal Law: A Concise Review. Netherlands International Law Review, 69(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-022-00229-7
Reuters. (2024, November 18). What Russia's invasion has cost Ukraine as war reaches 1000th day. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/what-russias-invasion-has-cost-ukraine-war-reaches-1000th-day-2024-11-18/
Rosenzweig, I. (2024). “When you have to shoot, shoot!” Rethinking the right to life of combatants during armed conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 106(926), 863–896. https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638312400016X
Safdar, M. A., Saadat Ali Nadeem, Syed Muhammad Wafa Abbas Gilani, & Prof. Dr. Rao Imran Habib. (2023). A comprehensive review of ICRC's role in promoting the applicability of international humanitarian law. Pakistan Journal of Criminal Justice, 3(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.62585/pjcj.v3i1.40
Sarkin, J. J., & Capazorio, R. C. (2022). The Syrian conflict as a test case for the limits of the international community and international law: Global politics and state sovereignty versus human rights protection. Human Rights Quarterly, 44(3), 476–513. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2022.0024
Secretary-General. (2013, August 19). Opening remarks at press encounter in New York. United Nations. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2013-08-19/opening-remarks-press-encounter-new-york
Shereshevsky, Y. (2022). International humanitarian law-making and new military technologies. International Review of the Red Cross, 104(920–921), 2131–2152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383122000443
Sotula, O., & Piątkowski, M. (2024). Air warfare over Ukraine and international humanitarian law. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 106, 13–33. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.106.02
Schmitt, M. N. (2012). Status of opposition fighters in a non-international armed conflict. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2184860
Steinberg, R. H. (2024). Politics and justice at the international criminal court. Israel Law Review, 57(2), 308–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223724000049
Theussen, A. (2023). International law is dead, long live international law: The state practice of drone strikes. International Politics, 60(4), 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00333-0
United Nations. (2023). Materials on the responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts. https://legal.un.org/legislativeseries/book25.shtml
VOA. (2023, June 7). Ukraine rejects calls to ‘freeze’ conflict, foreign minister says. https://www.voanews.com/a/ukraine-rejects-calls-to-freeze-conflict-foreign-minister-says-/7127974.html
Vukušić, I. (2022). Archives of mass violence: Understanding and using ICTY trial records. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 70(4), 585–607. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2021-0050
Winter, E. (2022). The compatibility of autonomous weapons with the principles of international humanitarian law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krac001
Yan, W. (2023). Analysis of the training paths for foreign-related legal talents: From the perspective of international humanitarian law moot court. Creative Education, 14(02), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.142018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
